A view across the developments, themes, pressures and questions shaping our practice.
Featured series
A practical series on how the new EU anti-corruption framework may reshape corporate exposure, internal investigations, governance expectations and enforcement risk in Romania.
Open hub →Why the transposition period should be treated as a preparation window, not a waiting period.
How the internal investigation produces the record on which Article 16 mitigation depends.
Why Article 16 self-disclosure mitigators operate most effectively where national law provides a defined cooperation route.
How exclusion, financial corrections and criminal sanctions can converge for companies dependent on public contracts or European funding.
AMBROZIE was retained jointly by the shareholders of a Romanian construction company to mediate a deadlock, closing the matter with a buy-out and no proceedings.
AMBROZIE acted for a shareholder in a private dental practice deadlock, securing a negotiated exit covering valuation, patient base, staff and non-compete.
O analiză a modului în care Marea Cameră CEDO a clarificat testul ne bis in idem pentru proceduri penale și administrative paralele.
What boards, general counsel and foreign investors need to understand about how Romanian law treats the company itself as a defendant and why the rules are about to tighten.
The National Anticorruption Directorate’s 2025 numbers show a system comfortable with guilty plea agreements, but still missing a pre-charge corporate resolution route.
Ten issues that may turn into criminal exposure for foreign companies bidding for or performing public contracts in Romania.
A practical analysis of the CJEU judgment in NTH Haustechnik and what it teaches about the risks of evidence-gathering in internal investigations.
AMBROZIE is advising a senior executive in EPPO proceedings in Romania involving an EU-funded industrial investment project, use of funds and corporate decision-making.
AMBROZIE is advising shareholders of a construction-sector company in a sensitive dispute involving intra-group dealings, governance concerns and potential exit scenarios.
A practical cross-border analysis of legal privilege and legal professional secrecy issues for companies facing sensitive investigations in Romania.
A practical analysis of when intra-group transactions may move from tax exposure into criminal risk under Romanian law.
Interviu acordat BizLawyer de Alexandru Ambrozie, Managing Partner AMBROZIE | Legal & Strategic Counsel.
Profile on the launch of AMBROZIE | Legal & Strategic Counsel and the firm's positioning for complex, sensitive mandates.
A view on how the EU Anti-Corruption Directive recalibrates corporate fine exposure.
Selected excerpts from an interview on business, regulation, criminal exposure and the judgement required when facts, intent and context are not immediately clear.
De vorbă cu Alexandru Ambrozie, Managing Partner AMBROZIE | Legal & Strategic Counsel.
AMBROZIE | Legal & Strategic Counsel intră în piață cu o identitate profesională distinctă, construită pe experiență senioră în drept penal al afacerilor, investigații interne, guvernanță corporativă și reglementare financiară.
Interviul acordat BizLawyer prezintă construcția noii firme și principiile care definesc această etapă profesională.